So basically, we are made to believe that as an act of generosity & kindness, the High King of Skyrim seceded Solstheim to the Dunmer so as to establish a safe-haven for refugees in the Red Year's aftermath. While I do understand that Dunmer flooding into Skyrim(& Cyrodiil) could've pushed the High King to give them a new home in Solstheim, do you guys actually buy that a sovereign just gave up (financially key) territory to "spare his people the blight of living with Dunmer"?
I can see how the matter was overlooked by Imperial administration, considering the Stormcrown Interregnum, but how believable is this secession of (what I at least consider) important territory? Judging from every official geographical rendition of Tamriel I've seen, Solstheim is basically northeast-ish of Blacklight (northwestern most Morrowind), so it being under the High King's control is evidently a financial gold mine, which I'm willing to bet has contributed vastly to whatever prosperity Skyrim enjoyed before that.
It just doesn't make sense to me. Under the Septim Dynasty, Skyrim was perhaps the most pro-Empire province (outside Cyrodiil obviously), while Morrowind was the perhaps least Imperial controlled province (along with Black Marsh). Why would the High King, at such an early stage, completely secede territory so economically beneficial just to avoid "having so many refugees"? Granted that refugees may not make for a scenario favorable to economic booms, it is still strategically key to the Empire & what nuisance of secession did Skyrim's nobility have at that time (more than a century prior to the Great War)?