Yous are both jackwads do either of you have a clue as to what this thread is about? now both of you go hijack another thread with your stupidity.

I do, [censored], I don't enjoy seeing people insult my favorite games though.

See my earlier post ABOVE that.

Thats even worse you actually stooped to his sub sonic levels of stupidity and challenged him to an idiot off.

You insulted one of my favourite games should I throw a hissy fit?

Oh piss off, I'm not in the mood to rant about you or the other idiot now.

Besides high and mighty sir Eden, would you really want to stoop down to my level and join us idiots or have you already done just that?

How is that arguing it's more showing self restraint and thanks for telling me to piss off .Nice to see I got under your skin ohh and calm down a little eh?

Why is boradam so pissed?

Seemed a little temperamental .

I just hope that they do something about the constantly developing world. I think we should let Avellone nuke everything to the orbit. It's not Fallout if everything is rebuilt, same ol' USA just with a different name and flag.


Though I would be interested to visit Europe, or even China.
Hit-and-running is not a viable tactic here in the Internet. It only makes you look like an idiot and everyone who sees your posts in this page will keep your attitude in mind for the times to come.

eventually fallout should end. there's nothing worse than seeing a series (be it film, book, tv, etc.) 'jump the shark'. when will that be? i don't know. but it will be sooner rather than later if beth forces their horrible writers on us for any more installations; one more fallout game written by beth is too painful for me to think about. (todd howard lose the ego and admit you're terrible at picking and implementing stories and characters in your games. stick to world/level design please). how should it end? with a nuclear war of course.

reminder: don't feed the trolls

Not necessarily. I think it's more likely that the former United States will be a patchwork of different factions, unless they're really taking the NCR=USA thing to its logical conclusion. It'd be interesting to see the interplay between them, like in New Vegas.

Pushing the reset button on the franchise is a terrible idea, imo. It feels cheap and would undermine the emotional impact of pretty much all the games that came before.

Yes and no.

If the core region were to come to a close with New Vegas and the Courier, I think that'd be a very good ending and a great way to close this chapter of the series.
But only this chapter. I still think the series is young and as long as it still has capable writers, there's no reason to cut it short. I question if I want to see a game after New Vegas because NV is such a PERFECT note to end the series on in that area. Doesn't mean the whole thing needs to end though; just move it to Seattle or Arizona or who knows where.

well it ain't ending so you might just have to avoid buying FO4 i guess.

eventually i'm sure it will end, but since bethesda owns the franchise and they made it a smashing success, you don't get to decide when it ends, so i'm sure some day it will end but i doubt thats anytime soon considering they're already working on FO4, so you can always just choose not to play the rest of em that come out, but todd howard and pete hines love the series and they already said they didn't buy the franchise to make just one game and go away. so thats the opposite of your wish.

I'd rather the game as a series end soon, because you can only have so many games before the game becomes the 'Sonic the Hedgehog' of gaming. I mean that in the sense that the only things that'd be left would be are two types of fan, the disgruntled fan who gripes and moans over the changes of their nostalgic childhood, and the fan that willingly wallows the fecal pile excuse of a game. It doesnt matter if you want to throw a hissy and say 'BUT I LIKE IT SO IT SHOULDNT END!', because quite frankly, the truth is, it's better you'e disappointed as a kid that Santa clause isnt real then being some 35 year old manchild who still actually believes some fatman sneaks into your house and leaves presents. It's best to let Fallout end while it's a LIKED game. In the game industry, letting a game have 3 games is a pretty bold endeavour without the endeavour beeing utter rubbish to the fanbase, but Fallout has had six games, one of those six is half jokingly 'banned' to be spoken of by fans because it was rubbish. No need to let it continue and just one after the other game becomes [censored].

Am I saying it should end right now? Not at all, but I think after Fallout 4, the seventh installment of the series, it's best to consider calling it quits while we're ahead.

No, Love all of the seriers and thought New Vegas was a excellent game. Not as good as F3 but still worth every penny.

Son of a [censored], where is Styles when you need him? Also, Alexander tends to brain-dead when it comes to any other game other then Fallout 3. He also needs to go back to grade school and learn english.

I say it should end with factions from all regions of the US taking absolute control of their territory, making advancements in technology, and learning of the rest of the world.

Then it speeds up a few hundred years to new Resource Wars that ultimately lead up to another Great War.

Perhaps this time there are less humans to survive and Ron Pearlman has been telling these stories to a group of tribals as he wanders the wasteland preaching the history of the Newer Old Word like a badass.

Then the game ends with 'War, War Never Changes.'

This is a time where we really need Styles, but I'm guessing he got fed up because of the OP's insults as well as all the brain dead forum goer you mentioned who turns nice happy threads into flame wars.

I agree with Longknife, I think New Vegas was a great way to wrap up that area of the Fallout universe, but I think Fallout games (if they're well written) that take place in other areas would be great additions to the series.

@Sebor: so Ron Pearlman would basically become the new Ulysses? that's a whole new level of badass.

If it so happens that New Vegas is the peak of the series anew, I wouldn't mind it being called quits a game of two after (if no improvement is made).

http://www.cracked.com/blogimages/2009/02/timepanties2.jpg

I wouldn't want NV to be the end, they reference so many unseen regions and talk about the MWBoS. I at least want the MWBoS to appear in a game before it wraps up.

Responce has a Lonesome Road Spoiler:

Well, all good things do come to an end. But when this ends it has to be a bit like this in my opinion:

A: ...and after the [player] stoped blah blah blah, blah blah, the world lived on to a greater futuer & lived happily ever after. ~Fin

B: ...and after the [player] stoped blah blah blah, blah blah, he then used his nuclear devices to completely whipe out humanity. ~Fin

No more from Bethesda? Totally!
No more from Obsidion? No - many more! But a few things need to happen.
First, ditch Bethesda's stupid 'only move the universe forward' rule. That makes sense for TES, but not for Fallout. Another 100 years and the setting will be meaningless. They need to be able to go back and do games 50 - 100 years from the great war.
Second, they need to be able to design from scratch, not be forced to stick to Bethesda's FPS-centric design.
Third, Chris and Josh need to stay on.