How do you feel about how the stories made your character out to be, you were basically the second coming of Christ in Fallout 3, as were you in Fallout 1/2... In fallout new vegas... You're just kinda a Cog in a machine, even if you do help more get accomplished than in 3..

Face it, the developers treated the game as if the bombs felt 20 minutes ago and not 200 years. A major fault.

I preferred 3 in almost every way personally. I enjoyed the massive feel of war in wiping out the enclave and mutants in various areas around the wastes and in the main quest line. I loved feeling like I was an over powered God running around in T-51b or Enclave hellfire armor burning everything with a heavy incinerator or blasting it with a gauss rifle or sneaking around with my chinese stealth armor slashing people with the shishkebab or just doing anything I WANTED TO DO, the countless hours of exploration and killing mutants/ enclave is beyond description as to how fun it was. In spite its lack of weapon customization a limited choice in story (I couldn't side with the enclave and just kill everything ) and horribly laggy dlc's (aside from broken steel) I preferred it to new vegas in every way almost. New vegas is closer to the original fallouts but it just lacks for me because there was no enclave to crush, there was no real enclave to side with (remnants don't count thats like 4-5 dudes..) and the final battle was so tiny D: ... I know this game was rushed but many of the features felt so lacking like not being able to have a choice at a perk every level, not being able to cook at ovens, it feels like fallout 3 if you took away half the world, and replaced it with twice as many bugs.. I have tried to enjoy this game but it's just too short, the replay value doesn't make me want to go back and do it over and over with various characters with different weapon specialization's.. But how do you all feel about this game as oppose to three, what do you like/dislike do you feel this was a good follow up to the original fallouts? *There is also the fact I have been able to put 3k hours into fallout 3 since it came out, and less than half that into New Vegas due to the fact my games data corrupts or i constantly freeze once I get past the boomers in game...* *Ending "BATTLES!!!!" in fallout 3 Destroy enclave at project purity, destroy enclave at their new base after broken steel, destroy enclave at the missile area and choose what to destroy with said missiles..* Fallout New Vegas ending battle *pop 10-20 guys across the bridge* deal with first boss guy through speech or violence... quickly... Deal with second boss guy in similar way.... Game over.. See my point? It builds up to a "HUGE" battle with very few people being there. I expected to see at least 200 guys on each side, not so few.

And surely the green tint would remain in Camp Searchlight for over 200 years? Haha, no.





Face it, the developers treated the game as if the bombs felt 20 minutes ago and not 200 years. A major fault.




Because Fallout 1 & 2 are far superior games? That's why.

And surely the green tint would remain in Camp Searchlight for over 200 years? Haha, no.





Face it, the developers treated the game as if the bombs felt 20 minutes ago and not 200 years. A major fault.




Because Fallout 1 & 2 are far superior games? That's why.

You mean because of the graphics?... No that can't be it. The voice acting?... Again no... The story, maybe based on opinion... A lack of unrealistic green tint? Well considering there is a forced evolution virus, radation makes things grow larger, and the vast number of unrealistic things in 1&2 that can't be it... Gameplay? Turn based vs real time shooter..? I suppose if thats your opinion but I fail to see how it is a better game.