» Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:07 am
I dont get the arguing and bickering about original fallout fans vs. post fallout 3 fans. I dont get it because there is literary nothing one side can do to change the others mind, despite what they will say. Original fans wont like any fallout game that bethesda makes, even if its a perfect game made in the exact styles of the two original games, simply because its bethesda making it, period. I understand that many of the original fans hate fallout 3 because 'bethesda messed it up and its nothing like the classics", agreed, but does that make fallout 3 a [censored] game? simply because its made from a different point of view then the originals?
I understand the feelings of a beloved franchised getting destroyed by new designers(I was a metal gear solid fan), but the dispure of this argument is about preference in style, not that either side is wrong. There were alot of good things about the originals, there are alot of good things about FO3, as well as new vegas, but just because one game came first doesnt give it the right to be called the best, its just opinion. I played fallout 3 first, then new vegas, then fallout 1, then fallout 2 and I have to say Fallout 3 is still my favorite. That doesnt mean that the other games are crap, because they arent, but for me and what I like in a gamem FO3 blew me away. FO1 and FO2 were really good games, but they didnt captivate me the same. Maybe if I had played them first things would be different, but I didnt. apples and oranges, they are all great games, but everyone has a preference and its usually based on nostalgia.
With that being said, I hope FO4 goes to: Boston(Commonwealth), New York or Chicago(Can you imagine mafia type families in Chicago or NYC?) priceless
P.S. I would also like to see another Fallout obsidian game