do you think if bethesda goes back to D.C. we will see old c

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:54 pm

I expect we will be kept abriast of happenings in D.C. in Fallout 4, but I don't expect or want the next game to be set in D.C. again. I'd love a game featured around The Pitt, New York or the Commonwealth, and those locations would certainly allow Bethesda to expound a bit upon what occurred post-Broken Steel in the Capital Wasteland.
User avatar
Marcin Tomkow
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 12:31 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:22 am

An entire game set in the same space as a previous installment would not be very good.


Did you really just say that?
I mean, really? You really just said that.
User avatar
Kyra
 
Posts: 3365
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:50 pm

Well, IMHO, as a HUGE fan of the CWBOS, I would like to know how things are going, after all, the last Maxson is there, and with him being taught by Elder Lyons, when he gets sent back west( if there is a west left, with their incompetence) and he will, there will be change with the Brotherhood, and we will see a more friendlier Brotherhood.

I think you overestimate the value of the DC Brotherhood (the true Outcasts), and vastly underestimate what we have already been shown is the reaction to attempts at massive change from within of the West Coast Brotherhood. Take a good long look at what happens to Veronica for attempting to force a change from within, and they were willing to do that to someone they considered part of their "family", let alone what they would do to an outsider from a group already considered to be traitors to the original Codex. The two factions meeting up will not end well.
User avatar
Alex Vincent
 
Posts: 3514
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:31 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:35 am

I honestly don't see Maxson going back west, the Brotherhood has far more of a future on the East Coast than it does on the West; they're facing down a large and powerful organized government in the West while in the East they are the large and powerful organized government.

The Brotherhood's future lies in the East; the western BoS is going to die out violently or fade into obscurity.
User avatar
MISS KEEP UR
 
Posts: 3384
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 6:26 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 1:48 am

I honestly don't see Maxson going back west, the Brotherhood has far more of a future on the East Coast than it does on the West; they're facing down a large and powerful organized government in the West while in the East they are the large and powerful organized government.

The Brotherhood's future lies in the East; the western BoS is going to die out violently or fade into obscurity.


I agree, but i hope Maxson grows up enough to talk some sense into anyone left out there, if there is anyone left out there to talk to, like Broken Hills for Example, i do not see that falling too easily.
User avatar
Nick Tyler
 
Posts: 3437
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:57 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:20 am

If Bethesda just wanted to make a post apocalyptic Bethesda game they probably shouldn't have bought the Fallout license and made a game called Fallout 3 purporting to be a Fallout game set in the Fallout universe.

Since they did it's pretty fair to expect it to live up to what a Fallout game should be and not just what Bethesda likes doing.

well thats true, but they still did a good job with it and FO3 was a smash hit. if they didn't buy the rights to fallout, there probably would be no fallout games at all, and they did get obsidian on board also, so the original fallout fans should be happy. at least besthesda was cool enough to make a move to make the original fallout fans happy.
User avatar
James Wilson
 
Posts: 3457
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:51 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:47 pm

well thats true, but they still did a good job with it and FO3 was a smash hit. if they didn't buy the rights to fallout, there probably would be no fallout games at all, and they did get obsidian on board also, so the original fallout fans should be happy. at least besthesda was cool enough to make a move to make the original fallout fans happy.

and we are happy, and we hope that Bethesda will see all the cool stuff in FNV that made us happy and incorporate it into Fallout 4, i have faith that they will learn from NV and Fallout 4 will have the good stuff from Fallout 3 and NV, and none of the bad stuff.
User avatar
Sasha Brown
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 4:46 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:19 am

Good lord, no. I want Fallout 4 to have as little to do with Fallout 3 as humanly possible.
User avatar
He got the
 
Posts: 3399
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:19 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:15 am

well thats true, but they still did a good job with it and FO3 was a smash hit. if they didn't buy the rights to fallout, there probably would be no fallout games at all, and they did get obsidian on board also, so the original fallout fans should be happy. at least besthesda was cool enough to make a move to make the original fallout fans happy.


Wrong.

Bethesda were merely the highest bidder. Other companies were vying for the license as well. Bethesda weren't the saviors of the francise.

Others may have made a better Fallout 3 (Or a worse one)
User avatar
joannARRGH
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:09 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:32 am

more bethesda bashing? as far as "ending slides" bethesda games generally don't end, didn't you know that? most of their games don't have endings. geez, so who cares about ending slides....you're expecting bethesda to completely change how they make their games, it ain't gonna happen, oblivion has a 9.6 game rating, and FO3 is rated at 9.0...not easy to improve on almost perfection

That's not how it works. Bethesda didn't buy the rights to Fallout to make a Bethesda game, they bought the rights to make a Fallout game. And Fallout games have lots of different ending sliders depending on your choices in the game, and then the game end.

If Bethesda sold the right to The Elder Scrolls to Nintendo, as someone mentioned, and they made The Elder Scrolls in their style like, I dunno, a platform game? With Wii controls? With cartoonish graphics? The Nintendo fans might love it, just like how TES fans loved the new Fallout, but the older TES fans might hate it, just like the older Fallout fans hated the new Fallout.
User avatar
lolly13
 
Posts: 3349
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:36 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:53 am

well thats true, but they still did a good job with it and FO3 was a smash hit. if they didn't buy the rights to fallout, there probably would be no fallout games at all, and they did get obsidian on board also, so the original fallout fans should be happy. at least besthesda was cool enough to make a move to make the original fallout fans happy.


Completely untrue. When Bethesda bought the Fallout license from Interplay another company called Troika was interested in obtaining it as well. Troika was a company founded by Fallout's creators and key designers (Tim Cain, Leonard Boyarsky and Jason Anderson). Thanks to Bethesda they not only didn't get a chance to make another Fallout game but collapsed as a company since no one wanted to publish the generic post apocalyptic RPG they were then forced to make. In fact Leonard Boyarsky actually approached Bethesda for the chance to work on Fallout 3 but was turned down.

So no it wasn't "cool" on Bethesda's part to cut out Fallout's original creators from the franchise they made just to make a game that draws far more from Oblivion than any Fallout game.
User avatar
Heather M
 
Posts: 3487
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:40 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:44 pm

This might be offtopic but I've heard this argument: "Well when I buy games from Bethesda I expect a Bethesda game."
And I think what people really mean is: "Well when I buy games from Bethesda I expect an Elder Scrolls title/Oblivion clone no matter what franchise it is from."
:twirl:

I wonder what the TES fans would do if TES was bought out by Nintendo and made into a copy of the Legend of Zelda, and the got rid of over half of the TES mechanics. Maybe then they would understand out position.

While this is an extreme example it is exactly what happened to Fallout.
*sigh*
User avatar
Sheila Esmailka
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:31 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:56 am

Did you really just say that?
I mean, really? You really just said that.


What's wrong with that? It may work for other games, I just don't see it being good for Fallout. If the next game was set in the exact same space as Fallout 3 or New Vegas, would you be happy about it? Even if the game was changed due to passage of time, we would know where everything is, and for a game of this nature (even for the old games), I don't see it as being good. Returning to a location like Megaton, Rivet City, etc through a map node system is fine, not the entire Capitol Wasteland as the sole location of a game.
User avatar
Jessie
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:54 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 2:31 pm

What's wrong with that? It may work for other games, I just don't see it being good for Fallout. If the next game was set in the exact same space as Fallout 3 or New Vegas, would you be happy about it? Even if the game was changed due to passage of time, we would know where everything is, and for a game of this nature (even for the old games), I don't see it as being good. Returning to a location like Megaton, Rivet City, etc through a map node system is fine, not the entire Capitol Wasteland as the sole location of a game.

I think he was refering to FO2 having parts of FO1
User avatar
Janine Rose
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:59 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:29 am

I think he was refering to FO2 having parts of FO1


Yeah, but I said that the entire space of a game taking place in the space of previous game would not be very good. I even advocated visiting old locations as long as the entire game isn't set there.
User avatar
Chris Johnston
 
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:40 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:57 am

I think he was refering to FO2 having parts of FO1


I think he was refering to the fact that basicly NV, FO2, and FO are in the same general area of Nevada/California/Oregon, while we had only FO3 in DC and Tactics in the Midwest. So in short, disregarding my previous post for now, we need it somewhere else, as THREE games are enough in one area, let alone one game in a certain are is enough.
User avatar
Anna Kyselova
 
Posts: 3431
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 9:42 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm

I think he was refering to the fact that basicly NV, FO2, and FO are in the same general area of Nevada/California/Oregon, while we had only FO3 in DC and Tactics in the Midwest. So in short, disregarding my previous post for now, we need it somewhere else, as THREE games are enough in one area, let alone one game in a certain are is enough.

But having a game in the same place in Fallout 3 wont give us a new area? I dont understand, nobody was objecting to a Fallout on the east coast, just not in the Capital Wastes.
User avatar
Nick Jase Mason
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:23 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:04 pm

But having a game in the same place in Fallout 3 wont give us a new area? I dont understand, nobody was objecting to a Fallout on the east coast, just not in the Capital Wastes.


Ok, getting back to my post, While i would love to see more of what would happen in the Capital Wasteland, i know it will not happen. So I will hope for someplace on the East Coast and Clues as that things were not screwed up in Canon history when FO4 is released.
User avatar
James Hate
 
Posts: 3531
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:55 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:08 am

Ok, getting back to my post, While i would love to see more of what would happen in the Capital Wasteland, i know it will not happen. So I will hope for someplace on the East Coast and Clues as that things were not screwed up in Canon history when FO4 is released.


I think some references to the Capital Wastes are a given if it's on the East Coast. We'll probably see Dr. Li, perhaps a couple others from Fallout 3 to talk about it. I see Fawkes (or Uncle Leo) making a return because he seems to be a fan-favorite, though I am not his number 1 fan.
User avatar
tegan fiamengo
 
Posts: 3455
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:53 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:33 am

DC was two Fallouts ago. I don't think there should be any more games set where FO 1 was in, much less 3.
User avatar
Bellismydesi
 
Posts: 3360
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:25 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:24 am

2 fallouts ago? lets see no icount 1 fallout ago :brokencomputer:
User avatar
Laura
 
Posts: 3456
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:11 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:07 am

I dont get the arguing and bickering about original fallout fans vs. post fallout 3 fans. I dont get it because there is literary nothing one side can do to change the others mind, despite what they will say. Original fans wont like any fallout game that bethesda makes, even if its a perfect game made in the exact styles of the two original games, simply because its bethesda making it, period. I understand that many of the original fans hate fallout 3 because 'bethesda messed it up and its nothing like the classics", agreed, but does that make fallout 3 a [censored] game? simply because its made from a different point of view then the originals?

I understand the feelings of a beloved franchised getting destroyed by new designers(I was a metal gear solid fan), but the dispure of this argument is about preference in style, not that either side is wrong. There were alot of good things about the originals, there are alot of good things about FO3, as well as new vegas, but just because one game came first doesnt give it the right to be called the best, its just opinion. I played fallout 3 first, then new vegas, then fallout 1, then fallout 2 and I have to say Fallout 3 is still my favorite. That doesnt mean that the other games are crap, because they arent, but for me and what I like in a gamem FO3 blew me away. FO1 and FO2 were really good games, but they didnt captivate me the same. Maybe if I had played them first things would be different, but I didnt. apples and oranges, they are all great games, but everyone has a preference and its usually based on nostalgia.

With that being said, I hope FO4 goes to: Boston(Commonwealth), New York or Chicago(Can you imagine mafia type families in Chicago or NYC?) priceless

P.S. I would also like to see another Fallout obsidian game
User avatar
cutiecute
 
Posts: 3432
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:51 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:02 pm

I would LOVE a Bethesda Fallout game these are in their game:

1. There are realistic Towns and Factions.

2. There is not combat at every single [censored] street corner. I want some peace and quiet.

3. NO BOS OR ENCLAVE! This is a must.

4. No God character.

5. Traits.

6. Every single improvement that Obsidian made in FNV.

7. Humanity is rebuilding.
User avatar
kennedy
 
Posts: 3299
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:53 am

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:40 am

Please no god character
User avatar
lauraa
 
Posts: 3362
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:20 pm

Post » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:27 am

I would LOVE a Bethesda Fallout game these are in their game:

1. There are realistic Towns and Factions.

2. There is not combat at every single [censored] street corner. I want some peace and quiet.

3. NO BOS OR ENCLAVE! This is a must.

4. No God character.

5. Traits.

6. Every single improvement that Obsidian made in FNV.

7. Humanity is rebuilding.


That game is already out! Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPnK9JHoddc
User avatar
m Gardner
 
Posts: 3510
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout Series Discussion