That game is already out! Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPnK9JHoddc

I dont get the arguing and bickering about original fallout fans vs. post fallout 3 fans. I dont get it because there is literary nothing one side can do to change the others mind, despite what they will say. Original fans wont like any fallout game that bethesda makes, even if its a perfect game made in the exact styles of the two original games, simply because its bethesda making it, period. I understand that many of the original fans hate fallout 3 because 'bethesda messed it up and its nothing like the classics", agreed, but does that make fallout 3 a [censored] game? simply because its made from a different point of view then the originals?

I understand the feelings of a beloved franchised getting destroyed by new designers(I was a metal gear solid fan), but the dispure of this argument is about preference in style, not that either side is wrong. There were alot of good things about the originals, there are alot of good things about FO3, as well as new vegas, but just because one game came first doesnt give it the right to be called the best, its just opinion. I played fallout 3 first, then new vegas, then fallout 1, then fallout 2 and I have to say Fallout 3 is still my favorite. That doesnt mean that the other games are crap, because they arent, but for me and what I like in a gamem FO3 blew me away. FO1 and FO2 were really good games, but they didnt captivate me the same. Maybe if I had played them first things would be different, but I didnt. apples and oranges, they are all great games, but everyone has a preference and its usually based on nostalgia.

With that being said, I hope FO4 goes to: Boston(Commonwealth), New York or Chicago(Can you imagine mafia type families in Chicago or NYC?) priceless

P.S. I would also like to see another Fallout obsidian game.

That game is already out! Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPnK9JHoddc

The folks who frequent "Interplay-purist" websites like DuckandCover.com are a bunch of whiny little nerds who obsess over the stupidest crap imaginable, and who will never. ever give Bethesda the slightest benefit of the doubt for having revived the Fallout franchise, much less for having made it thrive both critically and creatively.

Seriously, these idiots fill their Pampers Pull-Ups with beef stew every time Todd Howard says something in the press, as if he's the Ogre-King Tyrant of the World who "stole" Fallout away from its proper masters.

I dont get the arguing and bickering about original fallout fans vs. post fallout 3 fans. I dont get it because there is literary nothing one side can do to change the others mind, despite what they will say. Original fans wont like any fallout game that bethesda makes, even if its a perfect game made in the exact styles of the two original games, simply because its bethesda making it, period. I understand that many of the original fans hate fallout 3 because 'bethesda messed it up and its nothing like the classics", agreed, but does that make fallout 3 a [censored] game? simply because its made from a different point of view then the originals?

I understand the feelings of a beloved franchised getting destroyed by new designers(I was a metal gear solid fan), but the dispure of this argument is about preference in style, not that either side is wrong. There were alot of good things about the originals, there are alot of good things about FO3, as well as new vegas, but just because one game came first doesnt give it the right to be called the best, its just opinion. I played fallout 3 first, then new vegas, then fallout 1, then fallout 2 and I have to say Fallout 3 is still my favorite. That doesnt mean that the other games are crap, because they arent, but for me and what I like in a gamem FO3 blew me away. FO1 and FO2 were really good games, but they didnt captivate me the same. Maybe if I had played them first things would be different, but I didnt. apples and oranges, they are all great games, but everyone has a preference and its usually based on nostalgia.

With that being said, I hope FO4 goes to: Boston(Commonwealth), New York or Chicago(Can you imagine mafia type families in Chicago or NYC?) priceless

P.S. I would also like to see another Fallout obsidian game

Very funny...NOT!!!!!!

I want Bethesda's world with Obsidians Towns, story, factions, and writing.

Most (if not all) fans of the originals here admit that Fallout 3 was a good game in its own merits. :facepalm:

Not if you read the post on this thread. Its no biggie though.

Bethesda's world/landscape and towns and story. Obsidian's dialog.

No more God characters: Master, President Eden, Mr. House...no more

I think FO3 was paying homage to the older games instead of just 'stealing' them.

Alright, you are wrong on SO MANY different levels.

1. Bethesda was not the only company that wanted to revive Fallout you know, You had Troika, which had many Black Isle people. And you also had EA and Activision.

2. One of the only reasons it is thriving is because of the commercials of people getting their heads blown off. It completely fails as a Fallout game.

3. CREATIVE?!?!? Give me a break. FO3 copied both FO1 and FO2s story, gave it some changes, copied old factions etc. There is very little creativity in FO3.

Now, I am not saying that Fallout 3 is bad, its great, but it fails as a Fallout Game.

We're simply going to have to agree to disagree on this one, looks like. Fallout 3 remains one of the best-reviewed games ever produced, and plenty of those same critics felt it was more than a worthy successor to the first two entries.

That gives it quite a bit of legitimacy and weight right there, as far as its legacy is concerned.

Reviews don't count for much. All of the CODs get perfect 10s all the time and they are really dumbed down and full of explosions.

And, I doubt that some, if any of those reviewers actually played FO1 and FO2.

Alright, you are wrong on SO MANY different levels.

1. Bethesda was not the only company that wanted to revive Fallout you know, You had Troika, which had many Black Isle people. And you also had EA and Activision.

2. One of the only reasons it is thriving is because of the commercials of people getting their heads blown off. It completely fails as a Fallout game.

3. CREATIVE?!?!? Give me a break. FO3 copied both FO1 and FO2s story, gave it some changes, copied old factions etc. There is very little creativity in FO3.

Now, I am not saying that Fallout 3 is bad, its great, but it fails as a Fallout Game.

I love how people get sick of groups after one game when they major presence, cuz if that is the case, no factions should ever appear again. What a wonderful story that would be, no continuation, just randomness. Bleh.