Ah, the joy of ignorant, obnoxious "I'm right without proof" comments...
Oblivion's voice acted files filled just under half the disc. (1.7gb)
This was a pathetic amount of dialogue, too. I'll be nice, and say that 5x the dialogue Oblivion had will suffice. That's 8.5gb. (Morrowind probably had something like 20x the amount of dialogue)
And, how many voices where there in Oblivion? 7? People want one for each race. 10.
8.5x10 = 85 divided by 7 = just over 12
AND people want 3 voice actors per race. That's 12x3 = 36 I'll knock off a few gb for unique voices. now that's 30gb.
The ONLY way to have nice voice acting without comprimising quality and content is to wait for compression rates and disc sizes to allow voices to fill 1/10th of the disc (20 years?), or release the game on multiple discs, or remove full voice acting.
Next time you want to throw a "fact" in my face, make sure it's not unfounded crap.
Oblivion's voice acted files filled just under half the disc. (1.7gb)
This was a pathetic amount of dialogue, too. I'll be nice, and say that 5x the dialogue Oblivion had will suffice. That's 8.5gb. (Morrowind probably had something like 20x the amount of dialogue)
And, how many voices where there in Oblivion? 7? People want one for each race. 10.
8.5x10 = 85 divided by 7 = just over 12
AND people want 3 voice actors per race. That's 12x3 = 36 I'll knock off a few gb for unique voices. now that's 30gb.
The ONLY way to have nice voice acting without comprimising quality and content is to wait for compression rates and disc sizes to allow voices to fill 1/10th of the disc (20 years?), or release the game on multiple discs, or remove full voice acting.
Next time you want to throw a "fact" in my face, make sure it's not unfounded crap.
You blissfully ignore the fact that a significant portion of that dialog was recorded for specific individuals (like Patrick Stewart's voice for Uriel Septim), much of it quest related, and didn't need to be duplicated for each race and gender. Granted, the amount of space would still be "considerable", but if you're bashing someone for shovelling "unfounded crap" (as you call it) in their face, then don't "prove" your point with more of the same. Your underlying point is still relatively valid, but the justification is heavily flawed.
....and this abuse is from someone who basically agrees with you. Think of how silly your argument looks to anyone who is dead-set against your viewpoint.