I'm on the sceptical side of things. I'll be waiting on reviews before deciding on a purchase. If it is just more of the same bang-bang, shallow stories / quests, I will not be buying it right away, but wait until it go on sale or maybe even wait for all DLC's in a bundle deal.

I would like to know what the DLC will be based upon prior to offering an opinion. Without that info I cannot really say yeah or nay.

Who knows? That's like asking what kind of weather you think we'll have next week.

since i have 0 clue about DLC at the moment i will base my opinion on previews DLC and i will say, yes.

Fo4 was incredible and if the expand it will be even better.

People keep saying that DLCs will be great because generally TES's expansions are great, but Fallout is not TES and Bethesda seems to make Fallout games on a smaller scale: FO3 and FO4 have a fraction of quests Skyrim, Oblivion and Morrowind had (all of them have hundreds). So I don't think TES series' DLCs can prove or disprove anything where Fallout series is concerned. I think drawing conclusions from the quality of FO3's DLCs is more appropriate. Not that I'm saying that the DLCs wouldn't be good--they might well be.

Well if i were ever to buy a Season pass it would be for a Bethesda game as they usually deliver good content. I just don't get into that stuff. Still it was not that expensive, Battlefront season pass is 50 bucks and its a multiplayer only game.

Hoping that they will be good. I personally would rather focus on extending what I've built than going underwater, into space, etc.

Honestly? Yea you picked a good company for your first season pass. Bethesda is really really good with it's DLC stuff being like, actual expansions.

Tell them that Point Lookout for F3 and Dead Money for NV where the best. Rest was average or meh.