Simply not liking because you don't like it is a cop-out and tells me your opinion is not much of one at all.
You know, the thing about that is that it's not a cop-out at all.
So you would argue that quality is subjective? Music is anolyzed by chords, tones, pitch, and progression. Meaning if music meets or exceeds those standards it is considered good. Otherwise it is not..regardless if you think differently. I would like you to prove logically that quality music is subjective.
Yes, I absolutely
would argue that "quality," as you say, is entirely subjective in regard to music. You're proposed logic is absolutely illogical. Yes, music may be anolyzed and broken down into it's melodies, harmonies, chord progressions, etc., but not in order to determine if it magically meets some set of arbitrary standards and is '
good music' or '
bad music.' Music is about emotion, feeling,
connecting to the listener, etc. If music achieves these things, then it is good.
Btw, you can recognize something as quality but not necessarily like it. For example there are many incredible things people do that I don't particularly care about. Golf for example..could care less that Tiger Woods is a master golfer, but I'm not blind to recognize that he is very talented.
I never said that Jeremy Soule's work isn't "quality." I said I didn't like it. These are two different statements.
Now, this has gone on for long enough, and is already quite off-topic. I'll not continue this discussion in this thread (though if you feel you absolutely must continue, PM me).