Your honest rating of Fallout 4

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:28 am

If im using the op's poll my vote goes to 1.......BECAUSE IT'S [censored] NUMBER ONE GAME OF EVEEEEEERRRRR!!!!!!!!!! It even kick off smittywarbenjagermanjansen for 1st place.
User avatar
Anna Krzyzanowska
 
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:08 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:46 am

I gave it a 10. Not because I believe it is absolutely perfect, but because it is the best Bethesda game I've played since Morrowind.

User avatar
Sammygirl
 
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:15 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:47 am



I pretty much agree to this. While some improvements are very nice, the improved combat, improved companions, they took step backwards.



For negatives I would add lack of evil play, joining "evil" factions is a let down, no slavers, no gang to join, no merc/assassin crew to join, thus no quests in that regard either. No option other than Charisma in dialogue checks, which also removes dumb playthrough, smart guy playthrough, tough guy playthrough. Other major gripe is hardly any continuation of lore from FO 3, which is especially silly taking into consideration the connected quest of Replicated Man from FO 3. Not a single peep on the LW. It more like TES style lore than FO lore. A total lack of new and interesting factions, ie, we knew about the Institute, Railroad from FO 3, so we had a basic idea what they were like, and BoS is just the continuation of the BoS from 3. SM, ghouls, raiders are all the same as they were in 3, Gunners is the new Talon Company. Only major faction that was new is Minutemen and they are annoying as hell because of the repetition. It really stretches my suspension of disbelief with all the raiders, SM, and ghouls all over the place and how in the world anyone normal is alive in the Commonwealth(this is particularly annoying with how fast places respawn). The Vaults are lack luster compared to FO 3 and FONV.

User avatar
Spooky Angel
 
Posts: 3500
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 5:41 pm

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:11 pm

7/10 in its current state on Xbox One.


It could easily be an 8 or 9 if most of the bugs were ironed out, but as it is now, I think 7 is as good as it's getting. If the AI, broken settlement quests, and the settlement system itself were fixed it could be an 8, and with the coming DLC it'll probably make a 9 depending on how good the DLC is.

User avatar
Enie van Bied
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:47 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:20 am

Agreed 100%. I arrived at a 6/10 with these exact conclusions.
User avatar
Enie van Bied
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 11:47 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:56 am

I'd give it a 10/10 or 9/10. Though I don't like numbers. I'd find it hard to give a game anything lower than 7. As I'm not that picky. You can find fun out of any game.


Really enjoyed this game. Spent many times more hours on this than I could 3 and new vegas
User avatar
Noraima Vega
 
Posts: 3467
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 7:28 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:38 pm

Pretty much . Although my modded Skyrim is in the same joy ballpark for me. can't wait for the modding tools to come out.

User avatar
Lizzie
 
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:51 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:33 pm

I vote 8. The game is a good game, but not, for me, as good as Fallout 3 or New Vegas. This is Fallout 3 on steroids but without Fallout 3's atmosphere, world-building finesse or role-playing elements. Still a good game and more than worth the money, but not as good as it should be.

User avatar
Jason Wolf
 
Posts: 3390
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:30 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 3:39 pm

I guess the question is, what is a 10?



Is a 10 a hypothetical most perfect videogame ever that has everything right and an impossible level of depth and detail? Because if that is what we are rating it on, I would give it an 8.



If a 10 is comparing it to other real videogames made by real non-imaginary game studios, then I would give it a 10/10 because it stacks up strongly against any non-hypothetical videogame.






I would give Fallout 3 and New Vegas both a 6...

User avatar
Chloe :)
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 10:00 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:52 pm

That is the thing with a scoring system, no matter if its 1 - 10 or 1 - 5 stars. We all have our own versions of it, and therefore it does not work when using a poll like this. It is the same reason as to why it does not work with professional reviewers. A recommend, not recommend system would be the best, with detailing what the game does well and what it does not do well. All in all scoring a game using some sort of system with letters or numbers is broken. That is just my opinion though.

User avatar
Nancy RIP
 
Posts: 3519
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:42 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:35 pm

8/10 same as Skyrim



It's better than FO3 but not as good as NV imo.

User avatar
Liv Staff
 
Posts: 3473
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:51 pm

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:01 pm

I give it a 10.



The only thing I don't like about it is the dialog choices compared to prior Fallout games, but I'm not that upset with it to where it warrants a lesser rating in my opinion.



Plus there have been some dialog changes that are really great. For example, you can Quicksave at any point during the beginning and all through the dialog scene's so you can easily try out all of your options and repeat some to get a favorable dialog going with just a simple reload of a Quicksave.



The graphics are leaps and bounds better. Honestly, I wouldn't want them to be much better than this because I think it would take away from the game. It is a game after all. I wouldn't want it to be photo/video-realistic.



The only crashes I have had have been related to minimizing Fallout 4 and pulling up the Youtube App. Other than that I have had zero crashes.



I have run in to one bug in the 300 + hours I have played the game and a simple reload of a Quicksave fixed it.



It feels like there are more places to explore compared to previous Fallout games. Don't know if it's actually the case but it feels that way.



The whole settlement aspect of the game is like having an entire game within the game. It's pretty incredible that they got the quests, quest characters, and traders to all interact with the main game and the settlements as smoothly as they did.



And the way this game looks and works on a console is quite an achievement in itself in my opinion.



You can tell a lot of work and love went in to this game. It is a new beginning for sure but it's off to one hell of a start if you ask me, which you did, so there.



I love it. I haven't even thought of another game since Fallout 4 came out. I have 5 other brand new unopened PS4 games here that I bought with Fallout 4 thinking I was going to be bouncing between games for a while. I haven't even looked at the others.

User avatar
Frank Firefly
 
Posts: 3429
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:34 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:00 pm

A 10/10 is a perfect score.

User avatar
sam
 
Posts: 3386
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:44 pm

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:23 pm

6/10.



It's not a bad game, but it's not that good either.

User avatar
Shannon Lockwood
 
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:38 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:25 am

I have to give this game an 8, there's many, many regressions from the likes of the other Fallouts but I've invested over 100 hours already.

User avatar
Mr. Allen
 
Posts: 3327
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:36 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:22 am


But if the perfect videogame has never been made, then a non-perfect videogame somewhere must be worthy of that score.

User avatar
roxxii lenaghan
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:53 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 3:36 pm

Very true. But I think they should explain if the game is worth full price or not. For example I really like DA:I but I wouldn't spend more than $40 for the base( it's DLC isn't worth $15 each either) .

User avatar
tiffany Royal
 
Posts: 3340
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 1:48 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:08 am

You also have to remember that 1-10 score scale is actually 6 to 10 score, where 6 bad, 8 is average and 9 and 10 is good, with lower than six is reserved exclusively for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR3a0gixfwI.

With that in mind: more average than ever! Now with extra crappy dialogue!
User avatar
Cody Banks
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:30 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:16 am


In that case, I will give it a 12.

User avatar
Rhi Edwards
 
Posts: 3453
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:42 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:27 pm

That would be a nice touch. Adding a what you should pay for this. Full price, wait for sale etc. To bad that reviewers do not have the guts to do it, mostly because they are paid for positive reviews or need the ad revenue that some pusblishers contribute to their site.

User avatar
Monika Krzyzak
 
Posts: 3471
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:29 pm

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:41 pm


Why? This is just more of depressingly average in a new Bethesda-brand sandbox :shrug:
User avatar
David John Hunter
 
Posts: 3376
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:24 am

Post » Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:27 pm

I gave it a 7, based pretty much on the same criteria as others have stated. The main quest and associated plot strikes ma as a bit... "patchwork", but not terrible, I'd rather have options for more than one companion, and I'd really like a "snap" toggle for settlement building. I found some areas that were inherently cool, but way underused, leaving me with a sense that such places could have been soooo much more than they were.



With all that being said, I would have given Oblivion about a 6 initially, and Skyrim would have rated only a 5 but I ended up loving both games... However, once mods were added into the equation, everything changed. Graphics were better, stories deeper, opponents deadlier, magic, weapons and combat more interesting. I'm very hopeful (and expectant) that mods will do the same for FO4.

User avatar
Conor Byrne
 
Posts: 3411
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:37 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:15 am


I'll just quote myself from a different topic, because typing bores me.







User avatar
Connor Wing
 
Posts: 3465
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:22 am

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:37 am

@TeamBacon



I can't help but want to save your post for posterity....or something. :)



I loved the interaction between Danse, Arthur, and my character too! One of the best for me in the game so far.

User avatar
Kelly Osbourne Kelly
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 6:56 pm

Post » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:19 am


Same here. It is a masterpiece, though not perfect.



To put my evaluation scheme into perspective, from my "recently played (last couple years)" list (some of which are old games which I only recently acquired):


FONV: 8.5


FO3: 9


Oblvion: 9


Skyrm: 9.5


Minecraft: 10


AI Fleet War: ? would seem to be a 5 but learning curve is so steep I haven't got into it yet


Arma 3: ? Still haven't played it


Arma 2: 10


BioShock Infinite: 8


Banished: 6.5 maybe a 7


Crusader Kings II: 9


Jagged Alliance Back in Action: 8 (unmodded) but 9 with some mods


Kerbal Space Program: 8 or 9 meh, been too long since I played it . . .


Life is Feudal: 7 or 8 again been too long


Out of the Park Baseball 15: 8 or 9, it does what it intends to do well, but gets tedious after awhile . . .


Pool Nation: 6


Professional Farmer 2014: 6


Vietnam 65: 6


XCOM Enemy Unknown: 7 or 8


Civ V: 7 or 8


Space Empires V: 8


Supreme Ruller Ultimate: 8


Rise of Flight: 7


StrikeFighters2 Vietnam: 8 Fantastic game, but too repetitive


Jagged Alliance 2 with V1.13 mod: 10


Panzer General 2: 8 or 9 too linear

User avatar
Dragonz Dancer
 
Posts: 3441
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 11:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to Fallout 4