I was all prepared to write a few paragraphs about IQ tests, but Exorince beat me too it.
Essentailly, what Exorince said was spot on - at least according to what I have learned about fluid intelligence and static intelligence. So instead of a big long post, I'll just respond to people individually.
Good quote. Now that you mentioned them, Mensa wanted me. I didn't want Mensa. I don't even know why anyone would want Mensa. Even if I felt that Mensa was a fine organisation, I'm not so sure I would have applied. I'm much too lazy to use my brains for the good of man. <_<
Anyway, that fluid IQ issue was news to me. Interesting stuff. I always felt that this system was lacking. Couldn't imagine why I should be so "intelligent"...
(Also, why should anyone get angry about random numbers people post on the net?)
Also, did you guys know that the average IQ is the same among male and female population of the area they are observed in, but men have a much higher range both up and down on the scale? ^_^
Yes. Of course, I have a degree in psychology, so I kinda have to know these things.
Yes
It's embarassing. I had to take this long series of tests, and the school had pyschologists come in. My younger and youngest brother also had to take them.
People make too much of what Intelligence quotient tests show, or think that highly academicaly gifted people are superior. They are not, they make mistakes, too.
The most intelligent person in the room is the one who can solve the current crisis by judicious application of their knowlege. IQ tests mean jack squat to me.
If a pipe springs a leak in your home, and you lack the knowledge to repair it, and you hire a plumber, you bow financially to his superior knowledge.
Knowledge is not intelligence. You seem to be correlating the two of them, which is a mistake. I have lots of knowledge about the field of psychology - that doesn't make me intelligent, just knowledgeable. Likewise, I can have knowledge about how to fix a leaking pipe, but the action of fixing that leaking pipe is more of a skill than knowledge. Obviously someone who is intelligent is likely also knowledgeable about certain fields, but having knowledge does not equal intelligence. We can look at savants as an example - they generally have a low level of intelligence, but are brilliantly gifted in one particular skill (mathematics, playing an instrument, etc).
I haven't taken an IQ test but I took a Wonderlic test (if anyone knows what that is) and got 29.
I don't hold too much weight with these things because I feel it is more about knowing how to take a standardized test rather than actual proof of intelligence.
Where's a good place online to take one?
There isn't really an online site (that I know of) that adheres to proper IQ testing parameters. It is a better idea to simply find someone to administer the IQ test to you in the real world.
Too young to take one but If someone has a good IQ test online, I'd gladly take it :0
IQ tests can be modified to work with any age group - originally IQ tests were simply designed to tell if a child needed special education (was below average intelligence).
Also, my IQ is above 100 and below 200.